TheVine - News, Music, Fashion and Videos

Miss Universe invents time machine

Posted in FASHION by MelanieHick on May 17, 06:00AM
Miss Universe invents time machine
Adela Pankhurst Walsh Australian suffragette
Emmeline Pankhurst British suffragette
Finalists
Jennifer Hawkins
Miss Universe Australia 2007
Miss Universe Australia 2008
Rod Taylor and his time machine
Rose Scott Women's League Founder
TheVine stood in a room full of slobbering men and cheering women on Wednesday night/1962 to witness the feminist-free evening that is the Miss Universe Australia crowning. Highlight of the evening was two indigenous entrants. Society, that's your permission to objectify proud aboriginal women too.

Organisers claim theirs is some higher purpose of pageants, but truly their sole aim is to select the best physical specimens, to completely objectify and reduce someone to the sum of their looks alone. Pageants represent exactly what women have been chaining themselves to fences, being thrown in jail, fighting for fair pay and fairness in the workplace for a hundred years.

Yes, there's a faint nod to the contestant's intelligence. It's the Q&A section where this happens: "What environmental issue would you try to tackle as Miss Universe?" "Global warming, because I think it's an issue that affects us all" and "What would you do to draw attention to homelessness?" "I would, um tell people about it." Really.

The event organisers and Tottie Goldsmith are hardly entirely to blame. People keep entering them. People who are the prettiest of all their friends already. And who knows why they do? Perhaps they don't think they could make it on their brains alone. And maybe they couldn't. They are after all entering a contest to be Miss Universe Australia. Is it the universe or is it Australia? Or is Australia the universe. That would be a good question for the Q&A.

So thanks for the booze and canapes, you very pretty girls. But never try to defend a pageant for more than it is - a very simple way to un-pick intelligent people's hard work to advance women. Yes, you are all very beautiful, and credit to you for it, but events like this are essentially a meat market. Fuck, in those ridiculously small swim suits I can see your every spare rib, and what you ate for lunch too.


  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

  • Comments: 26
  • Views: 7509
  • Faves
  • Flag

Reader comments (26)

ProfessionalSlotJockey New citizen ProfessionalSlotJockey ON 17 May 2008 04:30:09PM "I think people should use less hairspray, like that is awesome for the environment" Quote from the brainless twat who won * * See disclaimer

  • Flag
 

LouPardi Royalty LouPardi ON 19 May 2008 02:34:38AM Breathing does emit a lot of carbon dioxide I hear. Maybe we could taxiderm her and set her up on a stand... same effect, less environmental footprint AND she'd probably weigh less - everybody's happy!

  • Flag
 

KO Royalty KO ON 20 May 2008 11:18:15AM I think Miss Universe ate some dumb-dumb soup for lunch because I saw her interviewed the next day saying that global warming is a concern because "it affects everybody in the world". GLOBAL warming. Sighs aplenty.

  • Flag
 

Sharkbait New citizen Sharkbait ON 20 May 2008 02:24:22PM What a narrow-minded, cliche and frankly antiquated view you're espousing. The view you're advocating seems to be that women must choose between valuing their appearance and valuing their ability; that somehow, entrants in a pageant are incapable of intelligent thought. Women can be beautiful AND capable. An intelligent woman might well choose an event like this to give them personal or career opportunities they wouldn't otherwise have access to. You'll probably berate me for not considering the wider ramifications on womens' rights. But I put it to you: isn't it the ultimate right of women to be able to choose their own personal identity, and not be shamed for not conforming to a cropped-headed, hairy-legged, bra-burned stereotype of female "freedom"?

  • Flag
 

KO Royalty KO ON 20 May 2008 04:41:44PM I think the real pressure on women 'conforming' is perpetuated far more by events like Miss Universe than by your "cropped-headed, hairy-legged, bra-burned stereotype". Testify!

  • Flag
 

Sharkbait New citizen Sharkbait ON 20 May 2008 04:54:57PM There's sure to be pressure from all of the various vested interests and bitter also-rans. But true freedom is the freedom to fulfill one's personal potential, and not to be categorised as "dumb" because you're beautiful (isn't this a form of discrimination in itself?), or "smart" because you're in a suit. A wise person makes the best use of their assets. If some of us were born smart (how lucky), and can make lots of money in great jobs, how dare we discriminate against others choosing to use their own god-given gifts, as if they are somehow inferior or less worthy?

  • Flag
 

Sharkbait New citizen Sharkbait ON 20 May 2008 04:59:00PM "Organisers claim theirs is some higher purpose of quiz shows, but truly their sole aim is to select the best mental specimens, to completely objectify and reduce someone to the sum of their intellect alone." How is this a more valid or worthy contest, hmm? Does winning Jeopardy somehow make one a better or more worthy human being?

  • Flag
 

KO Royalty KO ON 20 May 2008 05:07:05PM I don't think anybody has implied that people are stupid because they are beautiful, or clever if they're in a suit. The ladies in question are not dumb BECAUSE they are beautiful - they appeared dumb because they offered dumb answers to fairly dumb questions.

  • Flag
 

jdm New citizen jdm ON 21 May 2008 08:25:25PM Yes. The thing about beautiful people entering a beauty pageant is the entrants don't seem very intelligent. As any intelligent person would think. And this is a reason to deduce that beauty pageants are invalid. By the same reasoning, I don't think Tiger Woods is any good at basket-weaving. Golf tournaments are invalidated. Rudd can't ride a unicycle as well as I can. The last election is invalidated. I know! We who are basket-weaving experts can *mock* Tiger's answers on basket-weaving questions. Then we can feel all smug and clever. Those who fancy they have a place in an intelligentocracy and then throw barbs at those seeking to climb an aesthetocracy (which, like it or not, is a fundamental of Darwinistic evolution and has functioned since preCambrian times) achieve nothing but a demonstration of a lack of the very intelligence they think defines them. Does a beauty pageant function to diminish the achievements of the women's movement, loosely defined, since Pankhurst? Same question different nouns: does the woodchopping event at the Easter Show represent a threat to the achievements of the Industrial Revolution? If I choose to go to the opera, am I denying a place for the glorious entertainment we call television? Was Ian Thorpe a threat to the boat-building industry? Finally, melaniehick, you should learn to spell, and you should also forget thinking that swearing is a useful tool in rhetoric. It isn't. And relax, sweetie!

  • Flag
 

heatherjoy New citizen heatherjoy ON 22 May 2008 12:58:17PM Miss Australia Universe 2007 looks like somebody's Grandma!

  • Flag
 

Want to add a comment?

Signup for a free account, or log in (if you're already a member)

MelanieHick - A life more fabulous is what we all need. From the wild ramblings of my diverted mind come these brain drops of fashiony goodness that may or may not have anything at all in common with what proper fashion authorities deem appropriate. I hope for your sake you ...

Top Fashion Commenter

"Never gonna make you cry..."

  1. melaniehick 2. melaniehick

  2. eyecu 3. eyecu

  3. kattak 4. kattak

  4. arielamazing 5. arielamazing

  5. missdemeanour 6. missdemeanour

  6. tobler1 7. tobler1

  7. nick 8. nick